One world · 249 countries · Every country has a place in the news
AboutContactAdvertiseRSSSubmit News
ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITYYour business deserves global visibilityCHECK AVAILABILITY
⌕
LATEST
Home› Health› What would make neonatal units safer for babies? | Letters

What would make neonatal units safer for babies? | Letters

HealthBy Guardian StaffOct 22, 2026, 3:27 PM
What would make neonatal units safer for babies? | Letters
NEWS DESKHealth
PUBLISHEDOct 22, 2026, 3:27 PM
NEWS BRIEF

What the source reports

Dr Pamela S Melding highlights how New Zealand has created a healthcare culture where patient safety, interests and consent are the overriding principles. Plus letters from Mark Hanson , Paul Whiteing and a reader who lost her baby I support Mark McDonald’s submission that the Thirlwall recommendations will lead to more blame and suspicion in the NHS ( 17 October ).

We often hear of hospital scandals where trusts are intent on preserving their reputations, internal inquiries go nowhere, defensive clinical staff deflect blame on to others, non‑disclosure to patients of errors and “lessons learned” rhetoric that is quickly forgotten. There is also an industry of ambulance-chasing lawyers. None of this is conducive to a no-blame, honest, open culture in healthcare. The Thirlwall recommendations of more surveillance will make it worse. There is an alternative. Most of my professional life as a hospital consultant, clinical director and deputy chief medical officer has been spent in New Zealand, whose publicly funded NHS is the same model as the UK’s – but with a major difference. In the 1970s, New Zealanders lost their right to…

MORE CONTEXT

Continue with related coverage

Main source: The Guardian Health

TDBN presents the written preview supplied through the publisher's feed. Complete reporting, continuing updates, context, and corrections remain with the original report.

Read the complete report ↗
KEEP READING

More news from this desk

← RETURN TO HEALTH DESK