One world · 249 countries · Every country has a place in the news
AboutContactAdvertiseRSSSubmit News
ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITYYour business deserves global visibilityCHECK AVAILABILITY
⌕
LATEST
Home› Philippines› SC: Employees cannot be forced to retire before age 65 without consent

SC: Employees cannot be forced to retire before age 65 without consent

PhilippinesOct 28, 2026, 1:38 AM
🇵🇭 PhilippinesNEWS DESKPublisher image not supplied
NEWS DESKPhilippines
PUBLISHEDOct 28, 2026, 1:38 AM
NEWS BRIEF

What the source reports

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that employers cannot force their employees to retire early without an agreement. In a decision penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul Hernando, and was made public on Tuesday, October 27, the SC 1st Division said employees cannot be made to retire from their position before the mandatory retirement age of 65 without their clear and voluntary consent. Hernando, in the case, partly granted the petition of Rodolfo Ondevilla and found Colegio de San Juan de Letran (CSJL) in Laguna guilty of illegal dismissal. Ondevilla asserted in his SC petition that he never agreed to retire before 65. The SC accepted his position. Hernando explained that under the country’s Labor Code , the retirement age is set by an existing agreement or employment contract.

If there’s no agreement or contract, then the mandatory retirement age of 65 will be applied, along with the minimum age for optional retirement of 60. The ruling explained that optional retirement is based on a voluntary agreement between the employer and employee, and the latter must freely agree to it without pressure or coercion. But the SC said in the Ondevilla case that the early retirement happened despite the lack of a mutual agreement between the parties. Based on the decision, the SC said CSJL never made any proposal for a retirement plan to the petitioner that he could accept or reject, adding that there was no indication that the school was willing to discuss Ondevilla’s retirement. The High Court added Ondevilla’s objection to his supposed early retirement, along with his illegal dismissal complaint, showed that he had no intention of availing himself of optional retirement before reaching the age of 65. “Because his retirement was involuntary, the SC treated it…

MORE CONTEXT

Continue with related coverage

Main source: Philstar / Rappler

TDBN presents the written preview supplied through the publisher's feed. Complete reporting, continuing updates, context, and corrections remain with the original report.

Read the complete report ↗
KEEP READING

More news from this desk

← RETURN TO PHILIPPINES NEWS